Symposium: Who’s Governing Privacy? Regulation and Protection in a Digital Era
Peter J. Guffin, Kyle J. Glover, and Sara M. Benjamin
Dennis D. Hirsch
Local Law Enforcement Jumps on the Big Data Bandwagon: Automated License Plate Recognition Systems, Information Privacy, and Access to Government Information
Bryce Clayton Newell
Omer Tene and J. Trevor Hughes
Privacy and Security in the Cloud: Some Realism About Technical Solutions to Transnational Surveillance in the Post-Snowden Era
Joris V.J. van Hoboken and Ira S. Rubinstein
Waiting for Gluskabe: An Examination of Maine’s Colonialist Legacy Suffered by Native American Tribes under the Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act of 1980
Joseph G.E. Gousse
Trott v. H.D. Goodall Hospital: When Analyzing Employment Discrimination Cases Under Maine Law, Should Maine Courts Continue to Apply the Mcdonnell Douglas Analysis at the Summary Judgment Stage?
Ari B. Solotoff
What is the Scope of Searches of Cell Phones Incident to Arrest? United States v. Wurie and the Return of Chimel
Tyler J. Buller
Shailini Jandial George
Leah McGowan Kelly
David M. Faherty
Of Asthma and Ashtrays: Examining the Rights of and Exploring Ways to Protect Maine Tenants Living in Multi-Unit Rental Housing Who are Involuntarily Exposed to Secondhand Tobacco Smoke in Their Homes
Amy K. Olfene
Fuhrmann v. Staples Office Superstore East, Inc.: A Split in the Law Court as to the Definition of “Employer” Demonstrates the Need for Legislative Action to Amend the Maine Human Rights Act in Order to Protect Maine Employees
Stephen B. Segal[Top]
Who’s Governing Privacy?
Regulation and Protection in a Digital Era
A Privacy Law Symposium Hosted by the Maine Law Review Friday, February 21, 2014, 1:00pm-5:30pm Registration 12:30pm-1:00pm / Reception 5:30pm-6:30pm PROGRAM OF EVENTS Please note that, due to high demand, we have moved the symposium to Talbot Lecture Hall, Luther Bonney Hall, 85 Bedford Street, Portland, Maine
The Glass House Effect: Big Data, the New Oil, and the Power of Analogy • Dennis Hirsch, Geraldine W. Howell Prof. of L., Capital University Law School • Exploring whether environmental law’s response to oil spills can be used analogously as privacy law learns to respond to data breaches.
Local Law Enforcement Jumps on the Big Data Bandwagon: Automated License Plate Recognition Systems, Information Privacy, and Access to Government Information • Bryce Clayton Newell, Ph.D. Candidate, The Information School, University of Washington; J.D. University of California, Davis School of Law • Providing results of a large empirical study on automated license plate recognition (ALPR) systems, and examining popular legal responses for protecting privacy in light to access through state disclosure laws.
Privacy Law’s Precautionary Principle Problem • Adam Thierer, Senior Research Fellow, Technology Policy Program, Mercatus Center at George Mason University • Examining “bottom-up solutions” for dealing with privacy concerns raised by Big Data, social media, and youth Internet access.
Some Realism about Technical Solutions to Transnational Surveillance • Ira Rubinstein, Senior Fellow, and Joris van Hoboken, Microsoft Research Fellow, Information Law Institute, NYU School of Law • Analyzing enhanced protections for addressing transnational surveillance risks in the context of cloud computing.
Bad Samaritanism, the Entirely Predictable Effect of Section 230 ISP Immunity • Ann Bartow, Prof. of L., Pace Law School• Suggesting that the profitability of online bullying, stalking, and harassment may be reduced by increasing the possible avenues of ISP liability through a reevaluation of Section 230 immunity.
The Promise and Shortcomings of Privacy Multistakeholder Policymaking: A Case Study • J. Trevor Hughes, President & CEO, and Omer Tene, V.P. of Research and Education, International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) • Discussing the success and failures of multi-stakeholder self-regulatory efforts that provide the foundation for current U.S. privacy law.
Structural Limits on Government Access to Personal Data: A Post-Snowden Multi-National Comparison • Christopher Wolf, Dir., Privacy and Information Management Practice Group, Hogan Lovells, Washington, D.C. • Comparing governmental access to data in ‘the cloud’ in the United States to that in other countries, and the extent of protections afforded by the law.
Members of the Maine Bar May Register to Receive 3.92 CLEs Sponsors Include:[Top]
On behalf of the Executive Board, we would like to welcome the new members of the Maine Law Review, Volume 66:
The Editorial Board and Staff of the Maine Law Review, Volume 66
|Editorial TeamExecutive Editor: Rachel White*
Symposium Editor: Sara Murphy*
Articles Editors: Kevin Decker, David Faherty, Stephen Segal
Managing Editor: Adam Quinlan*
Production Editor: Anna Polko
Technical Editor: Meghan Myers
Research Editors: Emily Gaewsky, Ashley Janotta
Head CN/C Editor: Ryan Almy*
CN/C Editors: Christopher Harmon, Elizabeth Valentine
* Executive Board Members
|Maine Law Review Staff
Professors Dave Owen and Dmitry Bam
The Maine Law Review invites you to participate in its 2014 Privacy Law Colloquium. The Colloquium presents an opportunity for discussion and debate about the current privacy laws in Maine, the United States, and beyond. To complement the Colloquium, the spring volume of the Review will be devoted to high-quality legal scholarship focusing on a contemporary issues in privacy law, specifically those which concern the intersection of privacy and the constitution, the ever-evolving technological landscape, and challenges to civil liberty.
The Maine Law Review seeks submissions of papers for oral presentation at the Colloquium and for publication in its Spring 2014 volume. We invite contributions in the form of articles or essays primarily focusing on: big data and concerns for civil liberties; government surveillance and Fourth Amendment protections; and issues involving Free Speech and First Amendment protections within the privacy context. Paper submissions should range from 10,000 to 35,000 words in length (including footnotes).
Draft papers and queries may be addressed to Sara Murphy, Symposium Editor, at firstname.lastname@example.org, no later than September 20, 2013. Please include “Privacy Colloquium” in the subject line. Submissions should include an abstract, curriculum vitae, and indication of your willingness and availability to travel to Portland, Maine, to participate in the Colloquium on Friday, February 21, 2014.[Top]
Maine Law Review
Volume 65, No. 2 (2013)
→ Symposium: Law, Religion, and Lautsi v. Italy
→ Case Notes
Colloquium: Local Food || Global Food:
Do We Have What It Takes to Reinvent the U.S. Food System?
Zoning and Land Use Controls: Beyond Agriculture
Lisa M. Feldstein
The Renewable Fuel Standard: Food Versus Fuel?
Brent J. Hartman
The New England Food System in 2060: Envisioning Tomorrow’s Policy Through Today’s Assessments
Margaret Sova McCabe and Joanne Burke
A National “Natural” Standard for Food Labeling
Nicole E. Negowetti
When Fox and Hound Legislate the Hen House: A Nixon-in-China Moment for National Egg-Laying Standards?
Lucinda Valero and Will Rhee
Liberty of Palate
Samuel R. Wiseman
Symposium: Law, Religion, and Lautsi v. Italy
Malick W. Ghachem
The Lautsi Decision As Seen from (Christian) Europe
The Law Court’s Proper Application of Miranda in State v. Bragg: A “Matter-of-Fact Communication” to the Defendant Regarding Evidence Against Him Will Not Typically Constitute “Interrogation”
Stephen B. Segal
Do front-yard gardens and backyard chicken coops, as leading symbols of our thriving food movement, deserve First Amendment protection, much as black armbands did during the Vietnam War? Does a focus on “food miles” distract from the urgent need to reduce the greenhouse gases agriculture emits as we strive to feed a world population of 9 billion by 2050? Should the government mandate vegetable consumption — just as New York City and others have enacted bans on Big Gulps and trans fats?
The 2013 Food Law & Policy Conference, “Local Food || Global Food: Do We Have What It Takes To Reinvent the U.S. Food System?,” was hosted by the Maine Law Review this past Saturday, February 23rd. The event drew roughly a hundred attendees comprised of attorneys, law students, farmers, advocates, and interested citizens from Maine and beyond.
The conference brought together a diverse mix of topics and voices. Fifteen legal scholars from all over the country—New Hampshire, Vermont, Connecticut, Ohio, Nevada, Indiana, Idaho, Arkansas, Florida, California, and Oregon—tackled a spectrum of food issues. Among the topics covered: obesity prevention, global fisheries subsidies, farmland succession models, right to know issues, food sovereignty movements, and more. Even the First Amendment right to free speech was a point of discussion.
The wide range of emerging issues in food law and policy were loosely organized around three broad themes:
(1) The problems with the current federal approach to food regulation, especially to consumer safety;
(2) The legality of so-called food sovereignty and food choice movements; and
(3) How governments should respond to important emerging food trends.
A delicious, locally-sourced lunch was provided by Rosemont Market & Bakery, spotlighting ingredients from Maine farms and producers, including Fishbowl Farm, Sunset Acres Farm, Nature’s Circle Farm, Belanger & Sons, Freedom Farm, Sunset Farms, Rave’s Mustard, Kate’s Butter, Maine Grains, and VitaminSea Seaweed.
To emphasize the unmet need of access to healthful food in our own community, the conference spotlighted Cultivating Community, a nonprofit in Portland, Maine, that establishes urban and school gardens to implement its three-part mission of hunger prevention, youth and community development, and environmental modeling. Donations from sponsors and attendees collected during the conference will be passed on to Cultivating Community.
In many respects, the conference was a continuation of a conversation that people in Maine have carried on for many years—in academia, in the legislature, in town halls, and, of course, around the dining room table:
Where are we headed—as a state, as a region, and as a nation—when it comes to the production, processing, distribution, and consumption of food? Is this where we want to go? And do we have the right tools in the law and policy toolbox to get us there?
The conference reinforced that Maine is a place where people challenge conventional thinking, and test out new approaches—both outside and inside of the courthouse—with respect to food law, policy, and culture.
It also highlighted that, while many legal and policy challenges face Maine farmers and fishermen and there exists room for much improvement in the state’s food system, Maine is nonetheless well-positioned to be a national leader in developing a food system founded on locally grown and sustainably produced food, both from the land and from the sea.
The spring volume of the Maine Law Review, to be published in mid-May, will include academic essays on the food topics discussed during the conference.
Photo Credits: Tomasz Borkowski
The 2013 Food Law Conference was made possible by the generous sponsorship of:
Rosemont Market & Bakery
Sourcing local, seasonal foods so you can eat consciously, slowly, pleasurably, and well.
Coffee By Design
Handcrafted micro roasted coffee.
East End Cupcakes
Better than the cupcakes you remember.
Steamy. Hot. Soup.
LiveME | Maine-Inspired Apparel & Accessories
Proudly proclaim your love for Maine and some of its most cherished activities.
Maine Farmland Trust
Pierce Atwood LLP
The Student Bar Association
University of Maine School of Law
Local Food || Global Food:
Do We Have What It Takes to Reinvent the U.S. Food System?
Free and open to the public. Walk-ins welcome.
Saturday, February 23, 2013
Panel discussions run from 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM (come for all or one)
Location: Portland High School Auditorium (284 Cumberland Ave., Portland, Maine)
Join the Maine Law Review for a lively food law and policy discussion on Saturday, February 23, 2013, 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM in the Portland High School auditorium (284 Cumberland Avenue, Portland, Maine). This event will bring together more than a dozen legal scholars from around the country to debate the future of the U.S. food system, including:
(1) The problems with the federal approach to food regulation, and proposed fixes;
(2) The challenges facing food sovereignty and food choice movements; and
(3) Emerging food trends, and how governments should respond.
The day-long event is free and open to the public. Walk-ins are welcome.
Maine Law Review
Volume 65, No. 1 (2012)
CONSTITUTION DAY LECTURE: AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM, ALMOST (BUT NOT QUITE) VERSION 2.0
Richard H. Fallon, Jr.
MEDIATION AND INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT: A CHINESE PERSPECTIVE
WANG Guiguo and HE Xiaoli
STATE V. MCPARTLAND: APPLYING THE REASONABLE ARTICULABLE SUSPICION STANDARD TO SECONDARY SCREENING REFERRALS AT SOBRIETY CHECKPOINTS IN MAINE AND THE PROPER ROLE OF THE LAW COURT IN REVIEWING A TRIAL COURT’S APPLICATION OF THIS STANDARD
Holly L. Doherty